Among those”faithless electors” in the core of an upcoming Supreme Court instance says he is”thrilled” the high court will take on the problem and does not have any regrets about the way he throws his Electoral College vote for president even though it went against the wishes of his nation’s voters.
Though Democrat Hillary Clinton won the nation’s popular vote on Donald Trump.
Four decades after, Baca, 27, a government teacher in a Las Vegas high school, is not looking back and he is rooting for the high court to grant each of Electoral College associates”total elector liberty”
“Among the aims of this Electoral College would be to protect against a demagogue from accepting office,” Baca said, speaking to one of Andrew Hamilton’s contributions to The Federalist Papers. “And that is exactly what I attempted to do”
“It might have been an honor to vote for Clinton, but voting for her wouldn’t have averted a Trump presidency,” he explained. “I simply felt like I needed to do all I could to stop that from occurring.”
He explained that the choice to betray the voters’ will be a part of a wider effort he dubbed the”Hamilton Electors movement”
Baca, from the weeks before the December 2016 Electoral College elections (electors in most countries meet within their state capitals to cast their ballots), ‘d gotten in touch with dozens of different electors, expecting to see at least 37 Republicans prepared to cast their ballots for somebody besides Trump.
Had he been able to,” he stated, both Trump and Clinton could have been short of 270. In that situation, the House of Representatives would then have chosen the president, choosing from the 3 candidates who obtained the most electoral votes.
“I believed this strategy would provide Colorado voters a much better bargain,” Baca said. “They did not want Trump. They wanted anyone but Trump. I believed that when it got kicked into the House and they chose a more moderate Republican, then it might have been great for Colorado voters”
In the long run, Colorado’s secretary of state pulled out Baca’s vote and promptly replaced him with the other elector, who voted for Clinton.
The electors contested the penalties, but the state Supreme Court declared the law.
Faithless electors have never been much of a problem in the U.S. political background. However, in an election which could be determined with a razor-thin margin in the Electoral College, a tiny number of faithless electors could influence a presidential race — that many legal scholars say is a great cause for the Supreme Court into consider in.
The situation has also brought attention to a related dilemma: How can someone become a part of the Electoral College?
Even though former presidents and neighborhood elected officials happen to be electors in recent years, therefore have cleaning girls, marriage officials and ordinary joes like Baca, a former Marine who worked as a flight attendant and an Uber motorist.
Baca was approached by local officials for a Sanders delegate in the state Democratic convention, and he was finally handed paperwork to become among nine federal Democratic electors in Colorado. He filled it out and prevailed at a set of state and local party competitions to acquire an elector’s seat.
Four decades later, he’s — ironically — a region of the struggle into, in essence, eliminate the Electoral College.
“If people get the judgment [to get elector liberty ], I believe that it would need to lead to a constitutional change. I will not be writing it, but perhaps it would be known as the one Person, 1 Vote Amendment,'” Baca said. “A president chosen only by popular vote.”