Press "Enter" to skip to content

Brussels says planting three billion trees can help save Earth. Experts are not so convinced…

Concerning numbers, the toast has raised eyebrows: 3 billion trees within ten years is just three hundred million annually, or twice around 800,000 each day. When asked about the number of trees planted because May 2020, a spokesperson for the European Commission didn’t have figures, pointing rather to neighborhood counters preserved by several EU regions and member countries.

A counter from the state of Flanders revealed 232,968 plantings because October 1, 2019. Another, by the Czech Republic, revealed nearly 800,000 new plantings but didn’t offer a time.

Nonetheless, it is not the matter of whether the EU could plant three billion trees which had environmentalists rattled if the plan has been disclosed, it had been the question of if it ought to. While enormous reforestation captures attention, specialists say tree-planting does little to prevent what’s messing up the climate, the more uncontrolled burning of fossil fuels.

Small surprise then that gas and oil businesses are such big fans.

From the Netherlands, this included giving drivers the choice to buy carbon monoxide in the gas pump to offset the climate effect of forcing their vehicles an initiative which, while making motorists feel better, will do nothing to stop them driving their automobiles.

At the moment, the movement has been explained by Greenpeace as a”feel good” initiative which”lack[ed] real activity to reestablish forests and expand clean energy”, that had been”not merely a part of a dangerous diversion from the climate catastrophe, but signifies logging sector greenwashing”.

Greenpeace has been likewise critical of the European Commission’s three billion trees vow, pointing out that, similar to in the united states, reforestation can divert from the actual efforts to fight climate change.

“The possible climate and biodiversity advantages to planting trees are restricted, but the dangers of greenwashing are endless,” stated Sini Eräjää, Greenpeace EU agriculture and forest campaigner.

“Instead of simply tree planting, we ought to restore and protect the priceless forests which are under threat, and also make the actual cuts instead of offsetting.”

Sticks and carrots

From the Biodiversity strategy, the EC states that the EU Forest Strategy, expected to be published in 2021, along with the three billion shrub strategy particularly will produce jobs, such as in the group and cultivation of seeds, the planting of seedlings, and the observation of the expansion.

Gabriel Paun in Agent Green — a nonprofit NGO for ecological security in Romania — considers the goal is achievable so long as the property is identified with this new expansion from the first quarter of 2021. Paun stated that there are actual examples of where these projects are successful, such as Costa Rica, which has improved its forested region from 25 percent in 1990 to 52 percent in 2020.

In doing this, Costa Rica utilized both sticks and carrots. A ban on deforestation and elimination of subsidies to livestock farmers would be the latter, however, the prior – between communities at re-planting and benefits for album plantings – were equally as significant. It’s a strategy Paun would love to view in his native Romania, where illegal logging is,” he states, “out of control”.

But echoing the remarks out of Greenpeace, Paun explained that there is not much real will to prevent illegal deforestation from Romania, together with police detecting only 1 percent of estimates. Among the largest challenges confronting the EC in its plans, therefore, might not be planting new trees but shielding those which are currently fully-grown.

“More wood is burnt annually than lawfully cut, and high-capacity non-intensive wood processing plants are constructed that place unprecedented strain on the woods,” he explained.

“The occurrence of illegal logging hasn’t slowed down, regardless of the attempts of some state associations and public anxiety.”