Press "Enter" to skip to content

Can the drugs being used in the treatment of COVID-19 work? Euronews debunks the myths

With heaps of clinical trials in advance, the world waits with bated breath to determine whether a workable COVID-19 vaccine will soon be accessible in the not too distant future.

Researchers at the University of Oxford gave reason to trust earlier this month following the peer-reviewed findings of this institution’s first clinical trial revealed its experimental vaccine had generated anti-coronavirus antibodies.

Since the amount of COVID-19 cases nevertheless mounts around the planet, such as spikes in nations that have eased lockdown constraints, the daily attention of health care professionals has been relieving symptoms of the illness.

Nevertheless, it is not simple. Given the character of the virus, there’s absolutely no silver bullet to take care of it. When some medications and remedies are touted as miracle remedies, most are used carefully and, in some instances, without apparent clinical evidence of getting any advantages at all.

“Using lots of the medication, there is still doubt.

Much like many medications being used in the treatment of COVID-19 symptoms, redeliver stays the topic of lab studies estimating its effectiveness. An antifungal medication, it’s intended to hamper an enzyme that the virus uses to replicate its genetic material. And while it’s been roundly approved for usage in the EU from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), in addition to being used in Japan and the US, it remains debatable.

Of two ancient studies, just a randomized trial of 1,000 patients conducted by Dr. John Beigel and printed at the New England Journal of Medicine, demonstrated small benefits to patients that were prescribed the medication. On the other hand, the analysis was called into question,” Cook states, not least since the methodology has been changed mid-trial that has cast doubts about the information collected.

It did reveal that remdesivir’d the finest therapeutic results on lower-risk classes, for example young, white patients that had been on oxygen but did not have to be ventilated. “It appeared to have less advantage the sicker you had been,” he clarifies.

“In the case of remdesivir has some impact, it’s to shorten the disease. There is no obvious evidence that it enhances survival and there are no obvious signs that it shortens the illness from the sickest patients,” he adds. “It is controversial, so, that it has been rather widely accepted “

“I feel all patients with acute disease should be on dexamethasone unless they have a contrary sign,” Cook claims. Dexamethasone, based on research, is demonstrably the best available medication in reducing mortality rates in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The Retrieval study, that Cook calls”remarkable,” recruited 12,000 patients within three months.

Given the thickness of its extent, Cook believes it is by far the most definitive drug research so far and leaves few if some questions are unanswered regarding its effectiveness. “The results were so remarkable that the day that the results were published… that the Department of Health authorized its usage across the united kingdom,” explained Cook. “Although, honestly, given the outcomes, I believe clinicians could have decided for themselves.”

Its curative value is only one advantage of dexamethasone. Since it’s off-patent, the once-a-day shot or pill is very inexpensive to create and accessible around the globe. “It is not a panacea but its a significant treatment,” Cook concludes.

“When I urge something, they prefer to say’do not utilize it'” As late as July 28, Donald Trump was defending his marketing of an anti-malarial medication he thought was a promising treatment for COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine arguably just came into prominence as a possible remedy after Trump sang its praises but was widely discredited. Dr. Cook is less flattering towards the medication, telling Euronews: “It isn’t only ineffective; it is potentially harmful.”

In restricted randomized research in the united kingdom, where 1,500 patients were awarded hydroxychloroquine, it had been noted that it had”no advantage,” according to Cook. Patients who were prescribed the medication had remained longer in hospital, and”roughly 10 percent were not as inclined to leave hospital living within a month compared to patients who had the placebo.”

The anti-malarial medication, when used at the doses necessary to get some impact on symptoms of the virus, has been shown to have detrimental impacts on the rhythm of their heart, especially in higher-risk elderly patients with possible heart complications. “It [hydroxichloroquine] has no part to play presently,” claims Cook.


Like many medications that were connected using the new coronavirus, their first aim is to treat different ailments but possibly have therapeutic applications in COVID-19 patients. The same could be said of this anti-cholesterol medication fenofibrate.

“There are 10s of medications which have been demonstrated to be most beneficial in acute lung disease at the lab that does not translate to having advantage clinically,” says Cook. The findings assert that COVID-19 results in lipid deposits in the lungs that raise the seriousness of the virus, and this fenofibrate was demonstrated to stop in tissue samples at a laboratory.

According to Cook, there has to be an exhaustive study to reveal that the medication is safe about the new coronavirus, with additional larger studies to subsequently prove its efficacy. There’s not any evidence right now to prove it’s advantageous to COVID-19 patients.

But given how ancient the outcomes are, and just how small they are in extent, caution has to be worked out.

The encouraging results of the SNG001 trial were prematurely published to a media frenzy,” says Cook. Synairgen, a biotech firm based in Southampton in the united kingdom, was duty-bound to launch the findings ancient for regulatory motives with the stock market.

“If they’re as important as indicated, it’ll be extremely interesting and also a medication that will have to be considered further,” he added.

The very first positive results of the research, which surfaced with the protein being inhaled by individuals with a nebulizer, revealed a remarkable reduction of individuals developing acute symptoms. But, just 100 patients have been included at the trial that is far from important. “it is a little more intriguing than fenofibrate,” provides Cook.

Lopinavir and ritonavir

Antiretroviral medications lopinavir and ritonavir are generally used together to take care of individuals with HIV, helping reduce the sum of the immunodeficiency virus from the blood and so the risks of developing AIDS. Researchers at the World Health Organization (WHO) comprised the 2 medications in trials on hospitalized COVID-19 patients — that were part of a broader study named Solidarity that also looked in redelivering and hydroxychloroquine — but stopped it at the beginning of July.

“There is an assortment of studies happening globally about people but they could wrap up since we understand they are not powerful,” says Cook. In addition to this Solidarity analysis, lopinavir and ritonavir were also contained in the Retrieval analysis — the first detailed study into COVID-19 remedies to be printed that also contained information on dexamethasone amongst others. The first results discovered that the dual-use of those anti-virals did not lead to injury but they were ineffective against the virus.

Convalescent plasma

“A very different strategy is that the convalescent plasma that, again, is medication therapy,” says Cook. The therapy involves taking blood plasma from individuals afflicted by COVID-19 who’ve tested positive for generating antibodies, then utilizing it in turn for treatment to resist disease in patients ill with the virus.

Plasma is the attention of trials across the Earth, that have so far shown limited evidence that it may influence individuals. A trial from the University of Oxford reported that plasma treatment had no negative impacts on COVID-19 patients, demonstrating one dose was adequate to raise virus antibodies. Just like the majority of the medication on this list, it is going to have to be exposed to the rigors of additional study before it will become a mainstream therapy.