Press "Enter" to skip to content

Dozens of US soldiers Endured traumatic brain injuries from Iran Assault, Claims That the Pentagon

In the immediate wake of the January assault — retaliation to the assassination of Iran military leader Qassem Soleimani at a drone assault — US President Donald Trump chose to Twitter to assert no troops were hurt.

Half of those 34 injured have returned to military responsibilities, based on Jonathan Hoffman, the chief Pentagon spokesman.

The army said symptoms weren’t immediately reported following the attack and in some instances became understood days after. Many were in bunkers before almost a dozen European ballistic missiles burst, damaging many areas of the base.

Following the initial reports that some soldiers were hurt, Trump called these as headaches and stated the cases weren’t as severe as injuries between the reduction of limbs.

Hoffman’s revelation that 34 was diagnosed with traumatic brain injury, or TBI, had been the initial upgrade on the number hurt in Iran’s missile assault on Ain al-Asad airbase in western Iraq because the Pentagon said on 17 January the 11 service members were flown from Iraq with concussion-like symptoms. Days after, officials said more was sent from Iraq for additional diagnosis and therapy, but the Pentagon didn’t offer company figures on the complete or state whether any was returned to duty.

Seventeen of the 18 evacuees were shipped to Germany, and eight stay there; another eight have been hauled to the United States for continuous monitoring or treatment.

All 16 of people who have been diagnosed with TBI and stayed in Iraq have since returned to obligation, Hoffman explained.

The eight that have been shipped into the United States came Friday and will get treatment at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center at Bethesda, Maryland or in their home bases, Hoffman explained.

The US had no missile defense systems shielding Ain al-Asad from possible missile attack. Hoffman stated Friday that deploying one or more Patriot anti-missile approaches to Iraq is one of the choices currently being configurable by army commanders. The US had deployed several Patriot approaches to other nations in the area as security against Iranian missile attacks, such as in Saudi Arabia, but a strike on Iraq was viewed as less probable.

Trump has repeatedly asserted that no Americans were hurt at the missile strikes, a result he explained drove his choice to not retaliate farther and risk a wider war with Iran.

Some members of Congress this week pushed the Pentagon to get greater clarity on the range of the TBI instances caused by the Iranian attack. Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., composed senior Pentagon officials on Thursday requesting extra information on casualties in the attack.

“The purpose is to be transparent, precise, and also to offer the American people and our support members with the very best advice about the enormous sacrifices our warfighters create,” Hoffman explained.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *