Press "Enter" to skip to content

French MPs mull criminalising the sharing of Authorities Images online

French politicians have been debating a new law that would criminalize any societal media videos that identify police officers.

Report 24 would amend current laws to ensure it is an offense to demonstrate the identity or face of any officer on duty” to damage their psychological or physical integrity”.

The change to France’s international security laws was proposed in October from President Emmanuel Macron’s La République En Marche!

Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin states that the new amendment is crucial to”protect those who protect us”, amid reports that police officers are becoming targeted and threatened.

However, the law has proven controversial with human rights groups and media businesses, who assert that the wording is too vague and is a threat to media freedom.

What does Article 24 state?

Report 24 could make it an offense to”disseminate, by whatever means and on whatever medium, to damage psychological or physical integrity, the picture of their face or another section of identification of an official of the federal authorities or a part of the national gendarmerie when they’re behaving in the context of a police operation”.

The clause says that the officer has to be identifiable and the sharing of this movie has to be carried out intentionally to cause them injury.

However, the legislation doesn’t prevent journalists from conveying pictures of police officers into the”competent judicial and administrative authorities” within their job.

But, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said this post from the draft legislation was predicated on a”slippery notion” since the idea of aim was”open to interpretation and difficult to ascertain”.

“Any pictures or movie revealing identifiable police officers who are printed or broadcast by crucial media outlets or are accompanied by critical remarks could find themselves being accused of trying to harm those police officers,” stated RSF at an announcement.

“For journalists, the legal threat is different, and also the potential for conviction would be actual.”

RSF has also expressed worries that journalists’ offices and homes might also be searched after a prosecutor’s order under Article 24 complaints.

“The challenge is that the probable consequences of the article”, RSF spokesperson, Pauline Ades-Mevel, informed Euronews.

“The prosecutor could look for proof in the journalists’ mails or background and also we want clarity of the.

“The bill as it stands today isn’t the ideal way to protect against the authorities being endangered.”

The organization has called for obvious guarantees that the law wouldn’t enable police to detain journalists while filming or stop the press from broadcasting or publishing pictures of police officers.

France’s separate”guardian of rights”, Claire Hédon, has also said the laws could pose”considerable dangers” on data freedom and solitude.

Journalists’ unions and institutions assembled on Tuesday, external the Assemblée Nationale in Paris to show against the proposed change.

A French government spokesperson has said that the new modification is”clearly not a ban on broadcasting and filming police officers during interventions or demonstrations”.

Earlier this season, a 42-year-old French shipping driver Cedric Chouviat expired after he had been detained by authorities in Paris, and movie footage shot on the spectacle has turned into an integral part of their continuing investigation.

“It will suffocate truth and it’ll suffocate accessibility to justice,” Bourdon informed Euronews.

“You envision if this law was suggested in other European countries or the US, it is apparent that terrorists and citizens have always been able to take photographs of the cases “

Human rights groups also have contended that Article 24 would cover instances of police brutality and undermine citizen’s capacity to notify.

“If such a law were to enter into power as it sounds, it might constitute a significant breach of this right to advice, to respect for private life, and to freedom of peaceful assembly, three states that are nevertheless vital to the right to freedom of expression,” explained Amnesty France.

“This could promote a culture of impunity which damages the image of the authorities and leads to undermining the essential bond of trust between law enforcement and the inhabitants.”

The President of Amnesty International France, Cecile Coudriou, advised Euronews the law might have a”chilling effect” on taxpayers and stop them from coming forward with proof.

“We’re convinced that we can increase awareness among the people but also members of Parliament until they begin the argument.”

Parliamentary debates are scheduled to last until the close of the week.