Press "Enter" to skip to content

How are Russian press introducing the unfolding of events in Belarus?

On Saturday, Lukashenko suggested that he and Putin”agreed that in the very first request there’ll be comprehensive assistance offered to guarantee the safety of the Republic of Belarus.”

Russia has, in actuality, been responding in an uncharacteristically quantified manner since the events in Belarus have prevailed.

When upheavals struck other former Soviet countries — especially Georgia and Ukraine — Russia pounced on chances to improve its influence.

Moscow depicted those protests as Western-backed attempts that roped-in both innocent young folks and extremist forces, utilizing those arguments in support of its actions.

However, if Russia comes with a plan for Belarus, it is vague.

What does the press say?
Based on the Institute for the Study of War, Belarusian state media needed to add the remark that Lukashenko”would just encourage Russian forces” in case of external military threats” – an aspect that the president had not specified.

Normally, state media are a tool for authorities to manage their own political messaging and also a fantastic index of government policies. Nonetheless, in Belarus, one of the significant state media television channels went to attack in support of their requirements of the protesters.

But Lukashenko made sure to push home the message of an outside danger in the boundaries in a language in a pro-government rally on Saturday. There, he accused NATO of tanks and airplanes to the nation’s western boundary.

In a statement that the army alliance included its existence in the East”isn’t a danger to any nation” however” strictly defensive” in nature.

Meanwhile, Russian pro-Kremlin websites have been painting an image that suggests that Moscow remains on the fence whether to come to the help of Lukashenko.

“The main networking is state TV. The news coverage does show the scale of the demonstration, its calm nature, and the simple fact that several demonstrators are detained and badly beaten. At the same time, the policy claims that’the West is attempting to destabilize Belarus based on this situation of Ukraine.”

But, Tolz notes Russian state TV also calls outside the West because of its hypocrisy by pointing a finger in French President Emmanuel Macron, who’d called on Europe to encourage the anti-Lukashenko protesters at Belarus, yet didn’t do the same for its yellow-vest protests within his country.

Moreover, she states Russian state media is emphasizing how Favorable the West’s place is at Belarus, nevertheless it warns Russia to not interfere.

But she did not elaborate any further.

Russian press sympathetic towards protesters
Russian press seems to have taken a slightly sympathetic tone toward protesters and people siding with them.

This says she detected that a change in tone when she detected an increasing number of reports from the Russian state media which were very critical of Lukashenko.

By Tolz, an identical position has been articulated in the primary discussion shows on Russian state TV over the weekend.

Crucial article
This believes the”Russian government’s position could be determined in a post on the situation in Belarus from RIA” [one of the primary Russian state news bureaus ] printed August 18.

“While beginning by alleging that the West is eager to fan the flames from Belarus, this official admits that the protests have begun and are as big as they are with no Western activities. Most of all, he states that, when you have thousands and thousands of people yelling, you can’t start a crackdown. Employing the military or authorities is unthinkable,” Tolz notes.

She states that the announcement indicates”an increasing realization from the Kremlin which Lukashenko and his regime can’t be saved. Russia is likely hoping that it may assist with or orchestrate the election of Lukashenko’s successor who’d be pro-Russia compared to pro-Western.”

Some highlights from pro-Kremlin networking:
Instead of say TV, some information media in Russia are mildly critical of their protests in Belarus.

Argumenty I Fakty was reporting on these events. The tone of the reporting has been comparatively impartial, but it will show its colors in its choice of specialist listeners.

In a post comprising several expert opinions about the situation in Belarus, printed August 18, the vast majority of them are emphasizing the various ways that foreign powers could be included.

Among those pros raises questions regarding a Telegram station, which protesters had employed to organize themselves. Alexander Malkevich, president of the Foundation for the Defense of National Values, miracles who finance the station and notes that”directions for the riots seemed” on it a couple of days ahead of the election.

Izvestia, yet another online news resource, is sticking with information updates on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s telephone calls with European leaders to go over the problem in Belarus.

Komsomolskaya Pravda printed a post looking in the makeup of the resistance movement in Belarus, calling it an”alternative state device”. The writer concentrates on participants’ anti-Russian thoughts and nationalists and raises concerns regarding their financing.

Within an article now (18 August), it mentioned Zyuganov, who cautioned that the possibility of the collapse of Lukashenko could be damaging to Russian interests.

Zyuganov added the protests would destroy this country and called out resistance chief Svetlana Tikhanovskaya for having”no program”

“She doesn’t understand what to do, neither at the market nor in politics.

On the other hand, the newspaper also appears into what might occur if Lukashenko were to be overthrown.

The majority of the political scientists interviewed for this article concur that Lukashenko will probably continue to power until the very final minute, but they’re open to the alternative that fresh elections may happen. However, they are uncertain whether the resistance will be eager to be patient enough and place at the quantity of work required to alter the system.

Belarusian-Russian relations
Moscow was tight-lipped concerning the protests that started after the August 9 election where official results revealed Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko listed an improbable 80 percent landslide to win the sixth semester.

The diversity of the audiences and their massive size — over 200,000 in Minsk on Sunday by some estimates — undercuts the capacity of the Belarusian institution and Russia to assert that the protests are not representative of their nation as a whole.

Before the election, Belarusian police arrested 33 Russian security builders on charges of planning to foment unrest before the election. They let them move a week in a clear bid to fix the rift with Moscow.

Russia and Belarus have a remarkably close official connection, but one where acute spats frequently emerge. Both nations signed a marriage agreement in 1997 calling for close political, military and economic ties but stops short of a complete merger.

However, Lukashenko has accused Russia of trying to invade Belarus of its independence, and he’s made jagged feints at enhancing relations with the West.

“There is one significant point in the Russian state TV policy: Lukashenko hasn’t been a real friend or possibly a fantastic partner of Russia. He’s ever been duplicitous,” Tolz informed Euronews.

But a terse Kremlin readout of this telephone only emphasized the significance of maintaining the marriage agreement but did not mention the chance of security help or provide any other hints regarding Russia’s stance.

The existence of the Russian mercenaries along with the near Russia ties of a competition aspirant who had been denied a spot on the ballot and condemned — Viktor Babariko, former leader of a Russia-owned lender — a hint that Russia could have been putting a long-game approach to sabotage Lukashenko.

Russia hasn’t indicated how much or what type of security help it’d be inclined to deliver to Belarus when requested. Separately, the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, a six-country alliance involving Russia and Belarus, stated a Belarusian request for help would need to be analyzed by all members, a potential sign of hesitance to rush into Lukashenko’s aid.