Press "Enter" to skip to content

How can a 600-year-old river job play in the Czech Republic’s clean energy ambitions?

Before this month, the initial phase of the now more small plan was accepted by the Czech authorities, a 75km canal linking the Oder river in the north-eastern town of Ostrava into the ancestral town of Kedzierzyn-Kozle, which is determined by the intersection of the Oder and Klodnica.

The Czech Ministry of Commerce based its conclusion on a deceptive financial analysis that said the canal could be worth roughly $2 billion to the local market, states Jan Skalik, of Hnutí Duha, an Australian ecological group related to Friends of the Earth International.

Costing the government almost $550 million — along with the Polish authorities double this sum – the job is estimated to start in 2030.

However, Europe doesn’t have”a transportation crisis” that the World Wildlife Fund said this past month,” however includes, above all, a climate and biodiversity crisis”.

Its announcement also contended the Czech-Polish canal job will”not just [have] striking results on this [Oder] river and its floodplain landscape but are also of small use to inland navigation because its water amount is inadequate for transporting products.”

Environmentalists point out that a lot of the freight which would be hauled between Poland and the Czech Republic on the canal is going to be coal, an oddity because Prague has dedicated itself to quickly finish its reliance on coal-produced energy.

On October 15, Prime Minister Andrej Babis surprised many when he stated his administration will now encourage the European Union’s new proposed goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 55 percent by 2030, against 1990 levels, which just increases the requirement to decrease its coal dependence.

This past year the EU agreed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent by 2030, but earlier this year several member nations, such as Denmark and Sweden, petitioned for its emission-reduction aims to be raised.

Just 10 percent came from renewables from 2018. That year, the nation was ranked 20th worst on earth for CO2 emissions.

However, there are sizeable barriers in the means of change, nevertheless.

His remarks put him at odds with the public. Some 84 percent of Czechs agree that artificial climate change presents a substantial danger to the future of humanity, and 90% reckon decreasing greenhouse gas emissions is the only means to prevent climate destruction, according to a poll released in March from STEM, a local pollster.

But, just a quarter of respondents believed it had been economically profitable to decrease emissions. He’s not gone up to Zeman in climate skepticism but rather calls for a”realistic” approach to environmental coverage to not influence economic development.

Back in March, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Babis claimed that”Europe must forget about the Green Deal today and concentrate on coronavirus rather”. He was also originally skeptical of the new emission goals when they were increased earlier this season.

His worries, but now seem to have eased because the EU has revealed flexibility.

The only method is atomic
Based on Babis’ authorities, the only means for the Czech Republic to fulfill the EU’s emission-reductions goals is whether Brussels acquiesces into its plan for nuclear energy growth, as Prague asserts it can’t finish its reliance on coal via renewable energy.

“The Czech Republic does not have some other route than the atomic path toward non-emission resources,” Minister of Industry and Trade Karel Havlicek claimed in July.

The government’s present National Climate and Energy Strategy forecasts only a 20.8percent share for renewable energy by 2030, marginally more than twice its share now. Deloitte, a worldwide consulting company, published a study in September 2019 that contended renewable energy’s share might be increased to 23.8percent by 2030 with no significant additional burden on public funds. Nevertheless, this will not be sufficient to replace the Czech Republic’s dependence on coal.

The Czech Republic’s long-term state energy plan, issued in 2014, forecasts for four new nuclear reactors to be constructed by 2040, the earliest of which will be anticipated to see construction start in 2029 before executives start eight decades after, the authorities said earlier this season.

Babis pulled a concession in the European Commission last December so that expanding nuclear energy generation will be acceptable to replace the nation’s reliance on coal as part of their”Green Deal”.

However, Brussels will have to provide greater leeway in case it needs to maintain the Czech Republic’s service once it resumes talks, probably in December, concerning the brand new 55% emissions goal.

Huge state-subsidy invoice
In July, the Australian authorities agreed on a fixed-price buying contract with state-controlled energy collection CEZ for energy generated at the planned new reactor in Dukovany, among both Australian atomic plants. The authorities also agreed to an interest-free loan for the length of the arrangement between 2029 and 2036. It’s estimated to cost about $7 billion, but Bloomberg reported in July this cost estimate is very likely to grow as well as minority investors in CEZ are cautious of this undertaking.

But this bargain needs EU acceptance as it might violate the bloc’s state-subsidy rules. The European Commission is expected to concede on the issue later this season in return for the Czech Republic consenting to the Greater emission-reduction goal

Is a 55% decrease goal possible?
Whether these concessions in the EU will enable the Czech Republic to fulfill its emission-reduction goals by 2030 stays in doubt, even in Prague.

“The Czech Republic knows that the vast majority of EU countries are all set to back a 55 percent goal,” Milena Hrdinkova, Czech State Secretary for European Affairs, has been quoted as stating that month. “But it’s unrealistic for the Czech Republic itself”

But some environmentalists are somewhat more optimistic than police officers.

It’s”very likely” the Czech government’s doubt over the EU’s emission-reduction goals is due to a”misunderstanding involving key men and women in Catholic authorities [that ] did not understand that 55% decrease is connected to 1990,” said Karel Polanecky, an energy specialist at Hnuti Duha, the Czech ecological team.

If the EU’s increased goals are approved, it could be a 55% decrease predicated against 1990, not from today until 2030.

But, Polanecky noted, “the very important greenhouse-gas reduction possible is at the phase-out of this coal electricity industry”.

Right now, the federal authorities are insistent that this can only be reached through a greater reliance on nuclear power. However, for it to occur, the EU will have to create more compromises in December.