Press "Enter" to skip to content

Men still have the Large 3 mountain to Scale

Last updated on September 10, 2019

“The way you are playing is a huge joke,” Russian Daniil Medvedev said in the presentation ceremony, not able to clarify how Rafael Nadal flipped it about in the deciding set to win his fourth US Open and 19th Grand Slam title.

This was their supremacy the three of these have won 54 of their previous 64 Majors, accounting for a remarkable 84.345 success percentage.

Murray slides off

For a specific interval the Big Three was really the’Big Four’ with Andy Murray winning three Majors and also the Olympic gold awards in London 2012 and Rio 2016.

But, an elbow injury followed by a hip operation set the Briton from emptiness and Murray is currently fighting to make a comeback into the excursion.

No additional generation of tennis players have mastered the scene just like them be it that the 1960s age of Roy Emerson (placing the listing of 12 Slam names ), or the American-dominated 1990s streak of Andre Agassi and Pete Sampras, whose 14 titles became the newest pinnacle.

Considering that Federer won his first Important to start the Big Three age at Wimbledon 2003, just five men’s singles Grand Slam finals are played without the Big Three becoming included.

There were young challengers though.

But that danger was shortlived.

World tennis does possess the youthful blood such as the Zverevs, Thiems and Medvedevs, but if they will have the ability to break the dominance is still just another matter.

The nearest who arrived to break this album would be Medvedev when he levelled the game to 2-sets against Nadal on Sunday ahead of dropping the decider.

Compare this with women’s singles in which Canadian adolescent Bianca Andreescu, born at the turn of the century, raised the US Open crown Saturday evening beating Serena Williams.

Women’s tennis champions are inconsistent in the previous ten years so that barring Serena nobody was in a position to dictate the Slams.

Serena has become the only consistent element in women’s tennis, attaining at least Major closing since 2001, with the exclusion of 2006. Longing to match Margaret Court’s all time record of 24 significant names, Serena was stuck on 23 ever since her success at the 2017 Australian Open. And because her return to the tour in 2018 after being a mother, the 37-year-old has reached four finals–both Wimbledon and US Open every –moving down in each of four.

And since the start of the decade, no participant has managed to acquire three Slams or even more besides Serena and Germany’s Angelique Kerber. Actually, Serena (2010, 2012, 2013, 2015) and Kerber (2016) would be the only two who’ve been in a position to acquire more than one Important at a calendar year within this decade.

Though you have had players such as Kim Clijsters, Li Na, Petra Kvitova, Victoria Azarenka, Maria Sharapova, Garbine Muguruza, Simona Halep and Naomi Osaka who’ve won two Majors each within this decade, nobody but Serena has managed to get to the semi-finals and finals of the four Majors frequently.

You have experienced the Jelena Ostapenkos and Flavia Pennettas win a Slam and make a small buzz, however, their collapse was as fast as their increase.

Big Three age coming to a conclusion?

On the eve of the final, Nadal cautioned tennis buffs the age of the Big Three is coming to a conclusion. “We do not have to hold this age . We’ve been here for 15 decades almost. Sooner or later, (it is ) likely to occur sooner than later this age likely to finish. I’m 33. Andy is 32, also. The clock isn’t quitting. That is a part of the cycle of existence,” said Nadal.

But at least now, the stats agree to disagree.