Press "Enter" to skip to content

Sweden’s coronavirus exceptionalism Won’t be remembered favourably by Europe

While a lot of the planet is under lockdown or analyzing, Sweden has chosen to do it. Despite some constraints, like prohibiting public gatherings of over 50 individuals and stipulating that tables should be put aside, the roads stay bustling, pubs are still investing, and primary schools are available. Rather than imposing widespread limitations, the government has advised its citizens to behave responsibly by practicing social distancing and remaining at home when ill.

However, they’re greater than Greece or Portugal’s, whose inhabitants’ dimensions are very similar to Sweden’s and considerably greater than Sweden’s Nordic neighbors. This may not be viewed as a tragedy but neither is it seen as reassuring.

Nearly all Swedes continue to encourage their government’s strategy. Many assert that Swedes clinic social distancing as a cultural custom. Therefore, they can behave responsibly in the way the government is asking them to perform, without lockdowns. Many commentators see this as an instance of the confidence between the State and the individuals who make Sweden unique.

What Swedish policymakers forget are the global implications of the strategy, none more so than in Europe.

Let us imagine what occurs once the federal lockdowns in Europe are raised. Whether free motion between nations will be revived as it had been earlier is open to question. Whatever occurs, Swedes may find themselves in an, especially tough position. Without being under a lockdown or experienced a testing regimen such as other European countries, as well as a lot of those infected not showing any outward symptoms, some will respect Swedes as using a greater prospect of bringing from the illness.

It may not be possible to single out Swedes inside the EU. Nevertheless, some nations might reasonably require assurances from Sweden. This is very related to Sweden’s immediate Nordic neighbors, all of whom enforced a great deal more restrictive measures compared to Sweden. Citizens of both nations sail back and forth. An outbreak of this virus from Copenhagen due to a citizen or originating from Sweden will be a complex problem for the two to take care of.

Regardless of what the proponents of Sweden’s recent plan believe, they won’t allay these issues. This will be intense throughout EU level negotiations on growing of an EU-wide pandemic reaction system. Not having a coordinated EU policy, with every state taking separate steps and the absence of cross-boundary medical care are widely-regarded since the EU’s key failure within these emergencies.

Sweden is going to be set in an embarrassing place at which it might need to justify its strategy to people who’ve been the most populous by COVID-19. Its concept that Sweden differs from other nations, it respects human liberties, which it didn’t require lockdowns can be viewed as arrogant. EU says which are forcing lockdowns hasn’t done it since they are not as liberal compared to Sweden but since they had no other option. The prime example of this Swedish myopia is that the announcement made by its state epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, where he stated it was absurd to shut down national boundaries when COVID-19 was spreading in Europe. Italians who watched over 20,000 of the fellow citizens dying due to the virus, that this could be regarded as callous to say the very least.

It may be a fact that different nations should follow unique approaches to handling COVD-19 according to their socioeconomic conditions. What’s true though is that the coverage of a single nation has consequences on the others, particularly when it regards an infectious killer virus. By overlooking the worldwide consequences of its strategy and stressing its exceptionalism, Sweden’s short-sightedness won’t have gone undetected by its European allies.