Press "Enter" to skip to content

Can not you just fire ? Man paid to do nothing desired $2 mn

An executive who had been paid roughly $18,000 per month by LafargeHolcim Ltd. to perform nothing collapsed in his lawsuit to force the cement manufacturer to fire with a payout value greater than $2 million.

After his employer, Lafarge SA declared in 2015 that a staff-buyout program as part of its merger with Holcim Ltd., Antoine Zenone hoped that he might find a golden handshake.

The Paris appeals court ruled the Zenone could not gain in the plan because he had already agreed to an expatriate place in Singapore.

Zenone was seeking approximately 2.1 million euros ($2.3 million) and till lately was compensated 16,195 euros gross a month by Lafarge without needing to offer some work, by last week’s judgment.

The world’s two biggest cement manufacturers combined in 2015 to reduce prices and boost significance as demand for construction materials eroded. However, LafargeHolcim stocks slipped in succeeding years on a loss of investor confidence and a scandal within surgeries in war-torn Syria.

When Zenone came from his posting as principal executive officer of Lafarge’s branch in Singapore two decades back, Lafarge gave him a job manager position but he did not take the function. He says on his LinkedIn profile he began a new job in a plastic pipe manufacturer a month.

LafargeHolcim stated in a statement it will not comment on personnel matters. Zenone did not respond to requests for comment on the litigation.

Included in this tie-up, Lafarge told employees agents in May 2015 that roughly 380 jobs will be cut around the planet, in part by way of a voluntary program.

Two weeks before, he had composed an email cited at the court case he consented to shoot the Singapore place. “I look forward to beginning,” he explained.

French Deal

Had he responded two days afterward, Zenone could have been known to get a buyout.

Zenone later complained he was duped into accepting the Singapore ex-pat task and requested to return to a French contract.

He advised Lafarge in mid-2016 he had agreed to the post since he thought it meant finally becoming nation CEO for the two cement manufacturers’ surgeries in the southeast Asian country.

“He can not claim that his occupation has been made impossible since he chose to occupy his article for nearly 3 decades,” the judges ruled. The court added that there weren’t any signs that Lafarge was accountable for its failure to complete the merger of both firms’ operations in Singapore.