Press "Enter" to skip to content

Coronavirus: Would you capture COVID-19 twice? | Euronews replies

Researchers are working to find all they could about the behaviors of this COVID-19 coronavirus, from the way that it manifests itself within the body to the way it spreads between individuals.

In treating these infected, patients have been kept under strict quarantine for some time and are usually discharged after testing negative several instances for your disease.

However, a statement by a local government in Japan has stated it recently listed the very first case of somebody that has tested positive following seemingly recovering from a previous bout.

Only weeks after, the girl started exhibiting symptoms and has been analyzed again – just for it to come back just as another positive outcome.

This has reports concerning the chance of individuals being”re-infected” with COVID-19 though they might have fought the virus off a first-time round.

However, how realistic is your notion of re-infection? Here, Euronews requests the pros.

Experts have worried that nothing is impossible while the study is continuing to learn what there is to learn more about the virus.

However, in terms of becoming infected double, they generally state other situations are more likely.

Connor Bamford, a virologist in the Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine at Queen’s University at Belfast, advised Euronews it’s”improbable” the girl was re-infected but underlined there was a lot to find out.

He explained: “That is possibly a significant improvement but there is still a lot we do not understand.

“Additionally, this is very likely to be an uncommon occasion so that it may not make much of an effect throughout the outbreak.”

Meanwhile, Fabienne Krauer, an epidemiologist at Oslo, Norway, said: “We can’t know when this is a re-infection unless we explicitly know that the woman removed the virus between.”

She went on to mention that if it had been the situation as mentioned in Western reports that two evaluations in a month had returned convinced, then”we can not tell if this is a re-infection or a persistent disease”

Can it be a persistent disorder?

Short answer: it may be.

Philip Tierno, a professor of microbiology and pathology at NYU School of Medicine, advised Euronews one possibility may be that the girl was”initially colonized” from the SARS-like disease – significance that it lingered in her body without her being”really infected”.

He said she could then have undergone”a very gentle upper respiratory path, which didn’t evoke her immune system” and later tested negative if the evaluation didn’t pick the virus up somewhere within her body.

“Afterwards, she acquired a considerably lower respiratory disease,” he added.

Put more simply, based on Bart Haagmans, a virologist at the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, a moderate first infection could lead to a limited response in the immune system.

This could permit the coronavirus to”replicate upon another exposure,” he explained.

Any other options?

The two Tierno and Bamford noted that it might just simply be an error made with the testing process.

However, according to Bamford, these worries about re-infection aren’t yet a priority.

He explained: “We ought to keep your eye on this but I do not think that it is anything to be concerned about now.

“The vast, vast bulk of instances are from first ailments and these are the ones that we ought to be concerned about.”