Press "Enter" to skip to content

Denmark marks 100 decades of reunification – however what reunified and what do we learn?

This season has been recalled as the centenary of redrawing boundaries in 1 section of Northern Europe, together with Monday marking 100 years because the people who live in the area of Schleswig voted to stay with Germany or to combine Denmark.

It’s a year of pleasure for its Danes – that finally saw the reunification of South Jutland (North Schleswig) – and also, therefore, are marking the event with an event this week at Aabenraa.

Nonetheless, it’s also one of reduction for Germany, that was depleted of this northernmost portion of its region.

So – what was this territorial dispute and what do we learn now from the century which has since passed?

Prussian rule
This place the southern Danish boundary near the seaport of Kolding, while northern Prussia was at the town of Haderslav.

The very first ballot, held in Zone 1 on February 10, 1920, watched a vast majority of voters select Denmark, although the next ballot a month afterward in Zone 2 saw a vast majority side with Germany.

Consequently, the federal boundaries were redrawn, as well as by June 1920, the area of Schleswig was formally split in 2.

Central Schleswig, meanwhile, became a part of the Schleswig-Holstein area in northern Germany.

‘A reduction’ or’a missing girl who arrived home’?

But in Germany, he advised Euronews over the telephone,” it is somewhat different.”

He explained: “It had been a loss. The area was split.”

‘A Fantastic insecurity’

For both nations in the time that it was a period of”great insecurity”, Klatt added, as, throughout the 1920s and 30s, a few in Denmark wished to keep on deepening its new boundary, while Germany needed it back.

Klatt also pointed out that even though two referendums demonstrating a definite majority divide out of the northern Schleswig working with Denmark – and the southwest with Germany – there were national minorities to think about.

“You should not forget about 20-25percent of the populace in every referendum did not wind up in the nation they wanted to,” Klatt said.

“There was lots of unrest on the boundary “

“As it became apparent that West Germany would also join NATO, there wasn’t any longer room for boundary revision.”

Because of this, West Germany and Denmark came together to adapt national minorities on each side of the boundary, which may nevertheless be seen now with Danish churches and schools around the side.

. .and it turned into a fantastic version to incorporate people who did not get the boundary they voted .”

What can this boundary dare teach us now?

In assessing the problem with the UK’s recent death from the European Union – yet another depart or stay conundrum – Klatt indicated that there were takeaways in the Schleswig branch.

Primarily, are the federal identification and societal issues for people who did not get the”edge” they voted.

The next, Klatt stated, which”are quite frequently bemused”, would be the financial difficulties.

“It required 40-45 years for its people to settle with the problem in 1920,” he stated, adding: “It took 70 years to adapt to the financial situation.”

Speaking particularly about Schleswig, he explained: “There was an economic disaster from the 1920s and 30s.”

“Ahead of the vote it had been one efficiently migrated place and socially integrated”

“In the 1800s, it had been among the wealthiest regions of the monarchy….Flensburg, the largest town of the area, was the 2nd most important town in the state.

“Today it’s merely a little city.

“It dropped half its hinterland – in which folks came into the exchange and send kids to college “

He added: “The southern region of the boundary became among the weakest areas of West Germany before the 1990s.”

The regional market was so”stagnated” and did not grow as quickly as some other cities during those boundary doubts, he explained.

“It was rather hard to begin initiatives to the area’s market. This continued until the 1970s before Denmark became a part of the European community – as it became the part of Denmark closest to this community.”

With Schengen, folks cross [the boundary ] more for different actions.”

The boundary storyline still has its problems, Klatt stated, pointing toward boundary checks amid the migrant tragedy along with a”symbolic” weapon constructed to keep out disease-carrying wild boar.

But the story has shifted to one of”beating boundaries” and growing connections on each side, ” he explained.

Now, there’s a cross-border Euroregion called Sønderjylland-Schleswig, which communicates that.