The divisive survey saw Duda conduct a campaign with alleged anti-Semitic and homophobic undertones because he struggled to maintain the presidency.
Duda obtained 51.08percent of the vote while his center-right competitor Trzaskowski trailed with 48.92percent of their vote.
Listed below are just five takeaways in the election.
Poland remains profoundly divided
The tight race in Poland further disclosed that the nation is still deeply divided.
He confronted Trzaskowski at the next round of voting, who’s pro-European and supports civil unions for same-sex partners and opposes tightening Poland’s strict diplomatic laws.
Trzaskowski established an impressive effort, just becoming a candidate following the election was postponed as a result of coronavirus.
Pros said before this election it was a vote between two distinct visions of Poland.
“That is, naturally, a triumph, but at a mental and societal sense it isn’t a victory,” said Ewa Marciniak, a political scientist at the University of Warsaw.
The election saw a generational split, she added, with youthful voters behind Trzaskowski and elderly voters behind Duda.
Several have predicted out Duda’s homophobic and anti-Semitic rhetoric throughout the campaign.
LGBT rights turned into a key divisive point between both presidential candidates, together with Duda asserting to safeguard families against the”LGBT ideology”, saying it had been more dangerous than communism.
Trzaskowski’s platform, meanwhile, added support for civil unions for same-sex partners, resistance to the tightening of cyber laws, and the recovery of state service for in-vitro fertilization.
Individuals who ago Duda had indicated his competitor could sell out the nation to Jewish interests.
Poland’s election is unlikely to improve connections with the European Union that have criticized the country’s judicial reforms.
The EU has said that the reforms underscore the separation of powers between the authorities and the judiciary.
The bloc started its Article 7 process from Poland, discovering there was a threat to EU values along with also the independence of the judiciary. The proceedings could result in sanctions including the reduction of EU voting rights.
In 2018, Duda had known to the EU as an”imaginary community” which does little to assist Poland.
Turnout was high in 68.1%, coming near the record set in 1995. This will give the president “legitimacy,” explained Marciniak at the University of Warsaw.
Over 10 million people voted for Duda that she states is”a listing”.
“At precisely the same time, nearly 10 million resistance voters are [sending a message] into Duda his competitors are a massive number of people and he must also be president for them,” she added. “This is a challenging endeavor, however, Duda must begin doing it”
“It is an irony which, in an election in which many views that a negative growth for democracy moving ahead, such an indication of democratic wellbeing like high involvement happened. However, Higher involvement is not a neutral improvement, also, It carries political consequences,” said Angelos Chryssogelos, a lecturer in Politics and International Relations in London Metropolitan University
“It points to the achievement of Duda and PiS to mobilize voters – rural, older, less educated – that are favorably inclined towards them traditionally vote in fewer numbers than urban liberal voters”
Free rein until Presidential elections
It was seen how the vote will probably affect Poland’s prospective policies, even though critics of the ruling party-state that this will cement their conservative policies.
However, many have also blamed the judgment party that will lower inequality from Poland through economic aid measures and social welfare programs.
Numerous specialists have stated the triumph for Duda could cement the ruling party’s rankings giving them considerable leeway before the upcoming elections that are not until 2023.
“The government is free to pursue its agenda by controlling virtually all levers of forces from the political system, though Duda’s losing margin of success indicates that its dominance shouldn’t be taken for granted too long; an economic downturn of infighting at the regulating camp may endanger it in the next several years,” explained Chryssogelos.