Press "Enter" to skip to content

Judge threatens Harvey Weinstein with Prison for texting in Courtroom

Harvey Weinstein’s rape trial took a remarkable twist on Tuesday since the judge threatened to revoke his bond and jail the prior movie producer after grabbing him with his phone as jury selection got underway.

Say Judge James Burke requested the 67-year-old suspect, clearly angry.

“I am not searching for apologies; I am searching for compliance,” Burke stated.

The once-powerful manufacturer was released on bond but is needed to wear an electronic-tracking apparatus that has been visible on his arm when he arrived at court on Tuesday.

Jury selection started with Burke talking to 120 potential jurors from the court about the importance of customer support and telling them the individuality of the suspect.

“Having heard of him or even having discovered the allegations made against him in the media doesn’t disqualify you,” he informed them.

Forty of the prospective jurors said they couldn’t be impartial in the situation, and so were permitted to leave. Others have been excused after talking about the judge and attorneys in private about why it could be a hardship for them to function.

Burke read to jurors a record of dozens of titles that may appear in the trial, such as actresses Salma Hayek and Charlize Theron, who’ve accused Weinstein of misconduct.

This message propelled the #MeToo motion, which prompted girls to lodge misconduct allegations against strong men in politics and business.

Burke didn’t state if the people he said will be called as witnesses.

Prosecutors have said they might call three girls to testify about experiences with Weinstein, although he isn’t officially charged with offences against them. Their testimony is meant to strengthen the charges by demonstrating that Weinstein had a consistent pattern of behaviour.

After the day’s event ended only following 3 pm (1800 GMT),” Burke said only 36 of those 120 jurors called in the daytime stayed in the running. People who cut have been shipped home with written surveys and arranged to return on Jan. 16 for the next period of jury selection, where the last panel will be selected.

Another massive collection of jurors is predicted to be screened on Wednesday.

Weinstein has denied the allegations, stating any sexual experiences he’d were consensual.

Burke denied a petition by one of Weinstein’s attorneys, Arthur Aidala, to postpone the trial or allow additional time for jury decision since Monday’s fees would make it impossible to select a reasonable and unbiased jury weekly.

“I can’t think of a single time, one situation at which the day of jury decision this kind of bias has been throw against a criminal suspect,” explained Aidala, that held up copies of the New York Times, Daily News and New York Post with posts regarding the Los Angeles charges.

“I don’t see how anybody can answer honestly they’re reasonable and unbiased following this material is drilled into their brains,” he explained.

Legal specialists said the #MeToo motion and Monday’s fees could create jury decision challenging from the trial of Weinstein, who left his mark low-budget, critically acclaimed movies such as”The English Patient” and”Shakespeare in Love.”

“The suspect, Harvey Weinstein is a movie producer,” said the kind with 55 questions prospective jurors have been asked to reply. “Can you guarantee all parties you will establish this situation based only on the evidence you’ll hear in Court?”

Jurors were asked if they had read about the situation or Weinstein, whether they or a relative was a victim of sexual abuse or when they or a relative worked in the entertainment industry.

According to previous experience, about 500 were likely to appear for jury duty.

Prosecutors want all 12 jurors to back a certainty, while Weinstein needs only one holdout to get a hung jury.