Press "Enter" to skip to content

Thanksgiving honors refugees who left a new house in America. Trump’s policies do precisely the contrary

Back in 1620, a set of refugees, persecuted due to their spiritual faith, put forth from Plymouth, England, to get its”New World” — that was, needless to say, not new to the Native people residing there. Despite having no recorded invitations from the people of those countries where they planned to repay (despite historic evidence that indicates the regional people had suffered greatly in the hands of prior newcomers), we’re this week still observing that that the Wampanoag people welcomed those we now call Pilgrims for this property and helped them adapt to living here.

But out of the Thanksgiving tables, this government is barely paying homage to the most basic portion of America’s source story: ” We aren’t only a country of immigrants, but we were set by a group of refugees. Rather, President Donald Trump has announced that this nation is complete, especially to more refugees.

Doing this served two functions: It was a rallying cry to solidify his base and a statement to refugees and asylum-seekers to avoid. And while it is true our immigration system is strained — thanks in part to the president’s attempts to undermine it — it is a lie to say we can not accommodate anybody else.

Trump recently transferred to radically limit the number of refugees our country accepts down to 18,000 in the financial year 2020. It is the smallest number of refugees accepted because the program was set in 1980, 78 percent lower compared to 85,000 cap put by President Barack Obama.

However, our nation is not”complete”; our president is simply filled with it.

In reality, the U.S. does not even break in the top 100 most densely populated nations globally, rated only at 146 involving Venezuela and Kyrgyzstan. However, Trump’s remarks about the U.S. being”complete” clearly were not rooted in facts or information, but instead his comprehension of American attitudes toward immigration.

Then, the president isn’t right.

Even though the president’s foundation supports his anti-immigrant schedule, the vast majority of Americans strongly disagree with his revolutionary view and the draconian approaches employed by his government. A current Quinnipiac University survey discovered 75 percent of respondents thought immigration was great for the nation. Along with also a brand new Gallup survey on attitudes concerning Central American refugees demonstrated that 57 percent of Americans — together with greater consent from Republicans and independents — encourage taking them and making this country their dwelling.

As a congressman, I am all too knowledgeable about the president’s penchant for puppy whistle rhetoric and untrue assertions. And I attempt — in a bid to remain fair — to not take some of everything he says to heart. However, as a Latino representing the core of Los Angeles, his remarks concerning refugees and immigrants generally continue to hit a personal chord.

My parents, who lived at a one-room adobe home in Mexico, came to the USA in search of opportunity. My dad was a bracero — a farmworker cooked and — in different restaurants around Southern California. They raised six kids and helped place most people through college.

I think in America’s guarantee that in case you come here, think in our values, and contribute to our society, then you can call this nation your property. That guarantee was maintained for the sister, who had been granted citizenship this past year. It had been upheld to my other sisters, who became teachers and artists. And that promise has been maintained for my parents, that gave their youngest the chance to visit college and finally become a part of Congress.

The soul of Trump’s assertion that our nation is complete — which of opinions he has formerly made — have now been echoed around the entire world by dictators of the past and far-right extremists of now. The term evokes images of countless Jewish refugees killed in concentration camps following their ocean liner, the SS St. Louis, which has been turned off by the U.S. in 1939. It takes us back to 2014 when Nick Griffin, former chief of the British National Party — whose stage is”a comprehensive stop to immigration” — announced”that our nation’s complete, we will close the door,” to people speeding unthinkable violence. And the president’s portrayal of immigration within an”invasion” reminds us of this hate-filled manifesto of this Australian guy who implemented 49 worshipers in two mosques at Christchurch, New Zealand, after speaking to Muslims as”invaders” that”seek to inhabit my people’s lands”

In contrast to the Trump government’s attempts to brand them, refugees don’t represent a danger to national security, nor are they empty on our nation’s social safety net applications. Not only are they the very intensively vetted people to go into the U.S., exposed to years of safety screenings including comprehensive interviews, background checks and biometric information collection, however, they also help expand our national and local savings and fill crucial gaps in our labor market. You would think somebody who touts himself as a freelancer would love the simple fact that almost half of Fortune 500 firms were founded by refugees, immigrants or their kids — but would undermine the fictitious narratives he was able to propel him to the White House.

Certainly, coverage matters, especially if you are the president, however, the words used to promote this policy may frequently be equally as significant.

And, therefore, I’m thankful.