The Syrian authorities and resistance should proceed on large scale prisoner exchanges to construct confidence before their initial discussions next month in over annually, the United Nations special envoy to get Syria said on Friday.
The U.N. declared on Monday the creation of a constitutional committee for Syria, a long-awaited measure in a stalled peace procedure.
U.N. officials say this type of committee is essential to political reforms and new elections intended to unite Syria and finish a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced roughly half of their pre-war 22 million inhabitants.
“That is a deeply divided society, there’s a lack of trust, clearly between the 2 parties, but there’s also a lack of trust between Syria and the global community,” Pedersen said. “So the constitutional committee may be the first step in the ideal direction.”
Even a congress convened by Russia, a top ally of President Bashir al-Assad, requested the United Nations to make a committee to draft a new constitution after several rounds of discussions to end the war had failed.
The body will undermine 150 individuals, split three ways between the government, opposition, and civil society together with every side choosing 15 individuals to prepare and draft constitutional proposals.
“One significant confidence-building measure… the launch of abductees and detainees… in my view that it has not been in the scale we all actually must send a correct message,” Pedersen said.
“When we do so at scale… with the committee along with other elements of modifications on the floor in Syria, then it is going to send a significant message which a new start for Syria is potential.”
Successive U.N. envoys have neglected to prevent Syria’s civil war. Pedersen, the fourth person at work, has begun together with all the constitutional committee, a little effort in comparison to former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s effort to achieve a peace agreement for a global summit in 2012.
Pedersen confessed that there’ll be”lots of cynicism.”
Why does this not only be an additional round of useless discussions in Geneva? But… that is the first time that we have an arrangement between both parties,” he explained.
“I am the first one to acknowledge that this won’t be simple,” he explained.